01 / OWN THE BUSINESS
Founders & business owners
“Is my app in good shape?”
Understand the risks, ask better questions, and decide what deserves attention—even without a technical background.
YOUR STARTING POINTA plain-English health overview
Software health checks for founders and teamsRead-only analysis
Your app, explained clearly
Understand your app. Know what to improve.
Connect your GitHub repository. Get a clear view of your app’s security, reliability, and maintainability—with prioritized next steps and clear guidance on what needs further review.
Read-only GitHub accessPlain-English resultsPrioritized next steps
SOFTWARE HEALTH PASSPORT
Your app at a glance
82/100
Sample health score
A clear starting point.
Review the findings below to plan your next steps.
Security78 / 100
Reliability80 / 100
Maintainability86 / 100
Recommended next steps
PRIORITY01
Review vulnerable dependenciesVerified finding · Dependencies
High02
Document your recovery processInferred risk · Continuity
MediumNeeds confirmation Backup recovery requires further review.
One clear answer to the questions every software owner has.
01What was verified?
02What is urgent?
03What remains unknown?
04What comes next?
The app loads. The core flows work.
What you can see on the surface
WHAT ELSE NEEDS AN ANSWER?
01Are the security risks understood?Security & dependencies
A working feature can still rely on vulnerable packages or risky configuration.
ASK YOUR TEAMWhich known risks affect us, and what needs attention first?02Can the app change safely?Maintenance & testing
Outdated dependencies and gaps in testing can make even routine updates harder to validate.
ASK YOUR TEAMHow do we test critical flows before releasing an update?03Can someone else take over?Documentation & ownership
Essential knowledge may live with one person instead of in instructions the next developer can use.
ASK YOUR TEAMCould a new developer deploy and operate this app with the documentation we have?04Is there a way back if it fails?Recovery & continuity
A repository may contain recovery instructions, but it cannot prove that backups restore successfully.
ASK YOUR TEAMWhen did we last test a restore, and who owns the recovery plan?How it works
From repository
to clear next steps.
No monitoring setup or technical audit project. Start with the code you already have and receive a view both founders and engineers can act on.
Read-only connectionConnect GitHub repository
48 automated checksInspect code and configuration
Direct evidenceVerified findings
Evidence suggestsInferred risks
Evidence missingImportant unknowns
Software Health PassportPrioritized action plan
82What you receive
One report that makes your software understandable.
Your Software Health Passport shows verified evidence, inferred risks, confidence, and gaps that repository access cannot answer. Technical teams can inspect the evidence; founders can understand the decision.
Explore a sample Passport →82of 100
Sample Passport scoreSix evidence categories.
Six evidence categories.
One clear health view.
- Security78
- Dependencies71
- Reliability80
- Documentation88
- Maintainability86
- Continuity76
BUILT FOR YOUR RESPONSIBILITY
Different roles.
One clear view of your software.
Whether you own the business, build the product, or review the investment, start with evidence you can use.
02 / BUILD THE PRODUCT
Technical founders & leads
“What might we be missing?”
Get another view of your code and configuration, with findings your team can inspect and prioritize.
YOUR STARTING POINTEvidence behind the next priorities
03 / TAKE OWNERSHIP
Teams inheriting an app
“What are we taking over?”
Surface documentation and continuity gaps in software built by an agency, freelancer, or AI.
YOUR STARTING POINTA clearer handoff conversation
04 / ADVISE YOUR CLIENTS
Agencies & fractional CTOs
“How do I explain what matters?”
Bring a consistent review structure to client conversations and connect technical work to business needs.
YOUR STARTING POINTA shared agenda for improvements
05 / EVALUATE THE ASSET
Investors & buyers
“What needs a closer look?”
Use repository evidence to inform technical diligence and identify questions that need further verification.
YOUR STARTING POINTFocused diligence questions
Every role starts with the same foundation.
- Verified findings
- Clearly labeled risks
- Questions to resolve
02 / FROM INSIGHT TO ACTIONMake software decisions
Make software decisions
with evidence.
Turn technical findings into a clear next conversation. Explore how a review can help at the moments that matter.
What should we resolve before shipping?
Give your next release a clearer go / no-go.
SUGGESTED OWNEREngineering lead
THE TAKEAWAY
A focused release checklist
- Assess the affected dependency
- Test the proposed update
- Confirm remaining release risks
What the evidence says
Verified findingA dependency with a known vulnerability appears in the repository.
Why it matters
The dependency warrants review. Whether it is exploitable depends on how your app uses it.
Your next move
Ask your developer to assess exposure, update the package, and test the affected flows.
Can someone else take over this app?
Make the next developer’s first day easier.
SUGGESTED OWNERTechnical owner
THE TAKEAWAY
A practical handoff checklist
- Locate deployment instructions
- Confirm account ownership
- Walk through recovery steps
What the evidence says
Inferred riskDeployment instructions and a recovery runbook were not found in the reviewed files.
Why it matters
Important operating knowledge may sit with one person. Documentation could also exist outside the repository.
Your next move
Confirm where the instructions live, document missing steps, and have a second person walk through them.
Which improvements deserve the next sprint?
Give engineering work a business reason.
SUGGESTED OWNERFounder + engineering lead
THE TAKEAWAY
An evidence-led work plan
- Confirm business impact
- Estimate effort with the team
- Agree on the next priorities
What the evidence says
Illustrative findingsThe review identifies outdated dependencies and gaps in automated test coverage.
Why it matters
These areas may increase maintenance effort and make changes harder to validate. Business context determines urgency.
Your next move
Review the findings with your team, estimate effort, and prioritize work by exposure and business impact.
What can we demonstrate to a buyer or partner?
Bring clearer answers to the next review.
SUGGESTED OWNERFounder + technical owner
THE TAKEAWAY
A structured review agenda
- Gather supporting evidence
- Identify unanswered questions
- Assign follow-up owners
What the evidence says
Evidence summaryThe report brings repository findings, confidence levels, and unresolved questions into one view.
Why it matters
A shared record helps reviewers distinguish supported findings from areas that still need confirmation.
Your next move
Share the report alongside ownership records and operational evidence, then assign follow-up questions.
Examples show how to use a review. Actual findings depend on your repository and require business context.
SEE THE OUTPUT FIRST
Evidence before access.
Inspect a realistic report before deciding whether to connect a repository. See the findings, confidence labels, limitations, and recommended actions.